
In a March 7 livestream on YouTube — which now became suddenly relevant context — DiDio had already described some of what happened, though at the time it hadn’t gotten nearly as much attention. He described the gathering as roughly six Christian leaders convening in what he called “an Airbnb in the mountains of Tennessee,” where the conversation centered on a government investigation into crimes committed during the process of retrieving and reverse-engineering technology from what was described as “non-human intelligence.”
DiDio said phones were off. No recordings were made. And the discussion reportedly included what he described as a “propaganda plan” that was already in place leading up to the eventual public disclosure of this information.
A propaganda plan. Let that one marinate for a moment. The idea that there is an orchestrated communications strategy already being developed — not just for the public, but specifically targeting religious communities — is something we’re going to come back to, because it says a lot about how seriously the government appears to be taking the potential for a crisis of faith among American Christians.
Then there’s Tony Merkel, an American evangelist and podcaster who also corroborated the story, adding that he had been in contact with what he described as “Christians in intelligence operations” — believers who work inside the national security apparatus and who had been tasked, apparently informally, with helping prepare faith communities for the coming revelations. Merkel echoed Stone’s concern that intelligence officials were worried specifically about public panic and had identified church leaders as a key part of the solution.
What Was Actually Said in That Room
So what exactly were these pastors told? Based on the accounts shared by Stone, DiDio, and Merkel, the discussion covered some genuinely startling territory.
First, there was the matter of non-human craft. The pastors were reportedly told that the government possesses physical evidence — actual spacecraft or craft-like objects — that are made of materials that are, as Stone put it, “not allegedly a part of our planet.” This isn’t the usual vague language of “unidentified aerial phenomena.” These were specifics. Craft. Physical. Real. Not from here.

Second — and this is where it gets really cinematic — there were descriptions of what Stone called “very strange reptilian-looking creatures.” He acknowledged that even he thought it sounded fantastical, saying the details “almost sound like something out of a sci-fi movie.” But the implication was clear: the government has encountered, or recovered evidence of, non-human biological entities, and those entities apparently don’t look like the little gray men from classic alien lore. They look like something out of ancient mythology or, depending on your theological framework, something considerably more alarming.
Third, the pastors were told to brace for the possibility that the disclosure narrative might include framing these entities as beings from another dimension, or — and this is the part that clearly shook the religious leaders most — as “creators of humanity.” Yes, you read that right. The suggestion, at least as reported, is that whatever disclosure plan is being developed might present these non-human intelligences as the origin point of human life itself. Not God. Not the process described in Genesis. Something else entirely.
You can understand immediately why a room full of pastors would have walked out of that meeting with a very serious problem on their hands. Because if the government tells the American public that extraterrestrial or interdimensional beings created us, the theological implications are catastrophic — at least from a traditional Christian perspective. The entire framework of creation, redemption, sin, and salvation rests on a very specific understanding of who made humanity, why, and what that relationship means. Pull that thread and the whole sweater unravels, potentially.
Finally, according to the pastors, there was discussion of a broader plan — the propaganda or communications strategy DiDio mentioned — that was already being developed to shape how this information was presented to the public. The implication was that the disclosure wouldn’t just be a dump of raw files. It would be a managed, carefully framed release of information, and whoever was developing that plan had already identified the faith community as a potential flashpoint.
I’m SABear, and I urge you to continue to follow this series.

Leave a comment